[3.5] Fix Client: IsOptsWithPrefix returns false even if WithPrefix() is included #14187
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Make sure that WithPrefix correctly set the flag, and add test. Also, add test for WithFromKey. fixes etcd-io#14056 Signed-off-by: Sahdev Zala <spzala@us.ibm.com>
spzala
force-pushed
the
automated-cherry-pick-of-#14182-upstream-release-3.5
branch
from
92ac821
to
4df61af
Compare
ahrtr
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2022
|
Thank you @ahrtr !! |
serathius
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry pick of #14182 on release-3.5.
#14182: Client: fix check for WithPrefix op